Friday, February 21, 2014

The progressives in our government want stricter gun laws, why?  They are attempting to sell this by saying it will save lives.  That is an argument itself, but I will let the NRA refute that with their statistics.  To clarify, I am writing this with the opinion that stricter gun laws will not save lives. 

Since when do progressives want to save lives?  Progressives want abortions at any stage of development and in some cases after birth and not only in cases of blotched abortions.  They cite many reasons for this but it boils down that if a child is undesirable then they would like to opportunity to kill the child.  Examples would be birth defects, mental retardation.  Sound familiar?

Progressives also promote euthanasia.  If someone wants to die they feel that in the best interest of the collective to allow this.  If someone is old and a burden to society they would like them to be put down.  Currently only the fringe progressives are vocal about this but you will begin seeing a larger number of them that support this.  Tie this in with universal healthcare and the cost of caring for the elderly or the mentally challenged and the totals justify controlled death.  In their opinion.

Life is not important to progressives, they hate the idea that God gives us life and it is up to God to take it.  They hate the idea that people believe in Jesus Christ.  They hate the idea of the traditional family.  The traditional family is actually opposite of what progressives see as the future of our country.  Collective transformation is what they seek, kids being raised by the government, indoctrinated by the government and excluding the parents influence in the education of our future.

So I am to understand that progressives want to restrict gun ownership with the idea that it will save lives?  They are not in the business of saving live it is actually quite the opposite.

Progressive initiatives like Agenda 21 accounts for acceptable losses after the implementation of the sustainable development programs.  Some estimate that number could be 500,000,000.  They cite that the number of humans on the earth right now will eventually kill the earth.  It might, but humans are more important that the earth.  In my opinion.

So, since when do progressives want to save lives?  I recently read a good article talking about the people committing these horrific crimes, which has brought this issue to the forefront.  Columbine, Sandy Hook, Aurora Colorado Theater just to name a few.  These murders are NOT your NRA members , they are not your average hunters, they are not your average gun nut, nor your average redneck. 

They are as follows.

Ft Hood: Registered Democrat/Muslim.
Columbine: Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals.
Virginia Tech: Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff.
Colorado Theater: Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; progressive liberal.
Connecticut School Shooter: Registered Democrat; hated Christians.

Common thread is that all of these shooters were progressive liberal Democrats.

Found at clashdaily.com from Roger Hedgecock .  http://www.rogerhedgecock.com/

So in short their own people are committing these horrible actions of protest/political statements/I don’t even know how to describe this.  They are using their own people to kill innocent lives in an effort to disarm the population.  Disarming the population is their goal, not saving lives.  
  

The next question is why do they want to disarm the population?

No comments:

Post a Comment